| Title |
Effects of Immersive Virtual Therapy as a Method Supporting Recovery of Depressive Symptoms in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s375754 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pawel Kiper, Ewa Przysiężna, Błażej Cieślik, Katarzyna Broniec-Siekaniec, Aleksandra Kucińska, Jarosław Szczygieł, Katarzyna Turek, Robert Gajda, Joanna Szczepańska-Gieracha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 81 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 80 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,879,822
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,044
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,063
of 441,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.