↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clinical and pharmacologic aspects of blinatumomab in the treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 179)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
35 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
Clinical and pharmacologic aspects of blinatumomab in the treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, April 2013
DOI 10.2147/cpaa.s42689
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig A Portell, Candice M Wenzell, Anjali S Advani

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults remains a challenging disease to treat, and novel therapies are needed. Precursor-B ALL comprises 80% of cases, and the CD19 antigen is expressed in nearly all precursor-B ALL patients. Bispecific T-cell-engaging antibodies are novel bioengineered proteins. The bispecific T-cell-engaging antibody blinatumomab engages polyclonal T cells to CD19-expressing B cells. By binding to both CD3 and CD19, blinatumomab physically brings these T cells in close proximity to malignant B cells and potentiates T-cell-induced cytotoxic cell kill. Blinatumomab requires continuous intravenous infusion due to its short half-life, the need for continuous exposure for the drug to exert sufficient efficacy, and lessened toxicity. A phase II trial of B-cell ALL patients with persistent or relapsed minimal residual disease demonstrated an 80% rate of complete molecular remission. Cytokine-release syndrome and central nervous system events, such as seizures and encephalopathy, are reversible toxicities. Promising results in B-cell ALL with minimal residual disease have led to further evaluation of this drug in newly diagnosed and relapsed B-cell ALL.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 136 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 17%
Chemistry 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 33 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,798,066
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#35
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,345
of 212,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them