| Title |
Teleophthalmology with optical coherence tomography imaging in community optometry. Evaluation of a quality improvement for macular patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s26753 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon P Kelly, Ian Wallwork, David Haider, Kashif Qureshi |
| Abstract |
To describe a quality improvement for referral of National Health Service patients with macular disorders from a community optometry setting in an urban area. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 25% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 41% |
| Engineering | 6 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,210,739
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#462
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,219
of 246,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.