↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effects of regenerative radioelectric asymmetric conveyer treatment on human normal and osteoarthritic chondrocytes exposed to IL-1β. A biochemical and morphological study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Effects of regenerative radioelectric asymmetric conveyer treatment on human normal and osteoarthritic chondrocytes exposed to IL-1β. A biochemical and morphological study
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s42229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giulia Collodel, Antonella Fioravanti, Nicola Antonio Pascarelli, Antonello Lamboglia, Vania Fontani, Margherita Maioli, Sara Santaniello, Gianfranco Pigliaru, Alessandro Castagna, Elena Moretti, Francesca Iacoponi, Salvatore Rinaldi, Carlo Ventura

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease characterized by a progressive loss of articular cartilage extracellular matrix and is due to functional impairments occurring in chondrocytes. In previous works, we highlighted that Regenerative Tissue Optimization (TO-RGN) treatment with radioelectric asymmetric conveyer (REAC) technology influenced the gene expression profiles controlling stem cell differentiation and the pluripotency of human skin-derived fibroblasts in vitro. Since interleukin-1 beta signaling has been implicated in the induction and progression of this disease (through metalloproteinase-3 synthesis and nitric oxide production), we investigated whether REAC TO-RGN might influence the biochemical and morphological changes induced by interleukin-1 beta in normal and OA chondrocytes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#794
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,558
of 206,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.