↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Neovascularization for Evaluation of Endometrial Receptivity Using Magnetic iRGD-Modified Lipid-Polymer Hybrid Microbubbles

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Neovascularization for Evaluation of Endometrial Receptivity Using Magnetic iRGD-Modified Lipid-Polymer Hybrid Microbubbles
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2022
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s359065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanni He, Meijun Zhou, Sushu Li, Zheli Gong, Fei Yan, Hongmei Liu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,599
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#415,705
of 487,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#72
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.