| Title |
The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s386879 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawood Sayed, Jay Grider, Natalie Strand, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Steven Falowski, Christopher M Lam, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Douglas P Beall, Nestor D Tomycz, Justin R Davanzo, Rohit Aiyer, David W Lee, Hemant Kalia, Soun Sheen, Mark N Malinowski, Michael Verdolin, Shashank Vodapally, Alexios Carayannopoulos, Sameer Jain, Nomen Azeem, Reda Tolba, George C Chang Chien, Priyanka Ghosh, Anthony J Mazzola, Kasra Amirdelfan, Krishnan Chakravarthy, Erika Petersen, Michael E Schatman, Timothy Deer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 39% |
| Spain | 8 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Nepal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 22% |
| Scientists | 9 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 34% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 34 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#922,770
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#115
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,744
of 489,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#4
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 489,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.