↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Haptic-Assisted Surgical Planning (HASP) in a Case of Bilateral Mandible Fracture

Overview of attention for article published in International Medical Case Reports Journal, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Haptic-Assisted Surgical Planning (HASP) in a Case of Bilateral Mandible Fracture
Published in
International Medical Case Reports Journal, December 2022
DOI 10.2147/imcrj.s380604
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roya Moafi, Fredrik Nysjö, Johan Kämpe, Christopher Riben, Andreas Thor

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 67%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,941,392
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from International Medical Case Reports Journal
#317
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#360,795
of 452,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Medical Case Reports Journal
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.