| Title |
Takayasu’s disease effects on the kidneys: current perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijnrd.s146355 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gioacchino Li Cavoli, Giuseppe Mulè, Mario Giuseppe Vallone, Flavia Caputo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,647,369
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#76
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,396
of 331,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them