Title |
Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Ureteric Stones – State-of-the-Art Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research and Reports in Urology, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/rru.s311010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Radhika Bhanot, Patrick Jones, Bhaskar Somani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 15 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,292,367
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Research and Reports in Urology
#37
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,272
of 438,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Reports in Urology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.