| Title |
The Infiltration of Neutrophil Granulocytes Due to Loss of PTEN Was Associated with Poor Response to Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inflammation Research, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jir.s388990 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fei Wu, Jie Chen, Kang Yao, Daming Fan, Minglei Wang, Yongjun Liu, Shouhu Xin, Zeqiang Sun, Shun Li, Yang Sun, Qingyong Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#12,959,529
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inflammation Research
#187
of 834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,962
of 444,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inflammation Research
#7
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.