| Title |
Factors Associated with Transfer from an Acute Geriatric Unit to a Post-Acute Care Facility among Community-Dwelling Patients: Results from the DAMAGE Cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s370562 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Deschasse, Elodie Drumez, Fabien Visade, Anne Charpentier, Céline Delecluse, Gilles Loggia, Pascale Lescure, Jadwiga Attier-Żmudka, Jennifer Bloch, Cédric Gaxatte, Frédéric Bloch, François Puisieux, Jean-Baptiste Beuscart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 29% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
| Scientists | 6 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,372,296
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#251
of 1,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,729
of 493,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.