| Title |
Blended E-health module on return to work embedded in collaborative occupational health care for common mental disorders: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s43969 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniëlle Volker, Moniek C Vlasveld, Johannes R Anema, Aartjan TF Beekman, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen, Evelien PM Brouwers, A Gijsbert C van Lomwel, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis |
| Abstract |
Common mental disorders (CMD) have a major impact on both society and individual workers, so return to work (RTW) is an important issue. In The Netherlands, the occupational physician plays a central role in the guidance of sick-listed workers with respect to RTW. Evidence-based guidelines are available, but seem not to be effective in improving RTW in people with CMD. An intervention supporting the occupational physician in guidance of sick-listed workers combined with specific guidance regarding RTW is needed. A blended E-health module embedded in collaborative occupational health care is now available, and comprises a decision aid supporting the occupational physician and an E-health module, Return@Work, to support sick-listed workers in the RTW process. The cost-effectiveness of this intervention will be evaluated in this study and compared with that of care as usual. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 26% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,087
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,305
of 212,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#16
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.