↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Trends in Congenital Insensitivity to Pain with Anhidrosis: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2021

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Trends in Congenital Insensitivity to Pain with Anhidrosis: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2021
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, December 2022
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s390207
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shiwen Zhao, Xianwei Zhang, Mi Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Unknown 8 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,826,372
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,642
of 1,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,396
of 447,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#42
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.