↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nutrition in pregnancy: the argument for including a source of choline

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 896)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
42 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Nutrition in pregnancy: the argument for including a source of choline
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, April 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s36610
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven H Zeisel

Abstract

Women, during pregnancy and lactation, should eat foods that contain adequate amounts of choline. A mother delivers large amounts of choline across the placenta to the fetus, and after birth she delivers large amounts of choline in milk to the infant; this greatly increases the demand on the choline stores of the mother. Adequate intake of dietary choline may be important for optimal fetal outcome (birth defects, brain development) and for maternal liver and placental function. Diets in many low income countries and in approximately one-fourth of women in high income countries, like the United States, may be too low in choline content. Prenatal vitamin supplements do not contain an adequate source of choline. For women who do not eat foods containing milk, meat, eggs, or other choline-rich foods, a diet supplement should be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Denmark 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 100 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Other 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#664,916
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#47
of 896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,458
of 213,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.