Title |
Myasthenia Gravis and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome: New Developments in Diagnosis and Treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s296714 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert M Pascuzzi, Cynthia L Bodkin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 18% |
Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 25% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 14% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,270,860
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,088
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,035
of 487,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#16
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.