↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nonadherence in difficult asthma – facts, myths, and a time to act

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Nonadherence in difficult asthma – facts, myths, and a time to act
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, April 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s38208
Pubmed ID
Authors

John T Lindsay, Liam G Heaney

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 103 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 20%
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 10 10%
Other 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 42%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,560,742
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#216
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,467
of 212,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.