| Title |
Current and emerging treatment strategies for the treatment of actinic keratosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s9910 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua M Berlin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 300% |
| Researcher | 2 | 200% |
| Librarian | 1 | 100% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 100% |
| Other | 1 | 100% |
| Other | 2 | 200% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 500% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 200% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 100% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 100% |
| Engineering | 1 | 100% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#387
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,280
of 103,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them