Title |
The impact of mechanical cervical dilatation during elective cesarean section on postpartum scar integrity: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Women's Health, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijwh.s188628 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ayman Shehata Dawood, Adel Elgergawy, Ahmed Elhalwagy, Walid M Ataallah, Shereen B Elbohoty, Shereef L Elshwaikh, Amal A Elsokary, Ahmed M Elkhyat, Amr T Elbadry, Ahmed M Abbas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
Researcher | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 35% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,496,019
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#308
of 775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,496
of 436,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.