Title |
Safety and effectiveness of hyaluronic acid dermal filler in correction of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds in Chinese subjects
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s187079 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xia Dai, Li Li, Ward Peterson, Renate R Baumgartner, Jinmei Huang, Alexandra Baer-Zwick, Sonja Hoeller, Zrinka Ivezic-Schoenfeld, Martin Prinz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 31% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,681,963
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#401
of 918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,942
of 449,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.