↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

ReGAE 5: Can we improve the surgical journey for African-Caribbean patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery? Some preliminary findings

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
ReGAE 5: Can we improve the surgical journey for African-Caribbean patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery? Some preliminary findings
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2008
DOI 10.2147/opth.s2804
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinette Cross, Peter Shah, Martin Glynn, Shivani Chidrawar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Postgraduate 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Professor 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 16%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#820
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,392
of 105,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.