| Title |
Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Asia: A Scoping Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jmdh.s332579 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aisha Salsabilla, Alifia B Azzahra, Raden I P Syafitri, Woro Supadmi, Auliya A Suwantika |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,647,369
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#304
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,716
of 509,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#15
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.