↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Bevacizumab in high-grade gliomas: a review of its uses, toxicity assessment, and future treatment challenges

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Bevacizumab in high-grade gliomas: a review of its uses, toxicity assessment, and future treatment challenges
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, April 2013
DOI 10.2147/ott.s38628
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gazanfar Rahmathulla, Elizabeth J Hovey, Neda Hashemi-Sadraei, Manmeet S Ahluwalia

Abstract

High-grade gliomas continue to have dismal prognosis despite advances made in understanding the molecular genetics, signaling pathways, cytoskeletal dynamics, and the role of stem cells in gliomagenesis. Conventional treatment approaches, including surgery, radiotherapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy, have been used with limited success. Therapeutic advances using molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and others such as dietary treatments have not been able to halt tumor progression and disease-related death. High-grade gliomas (World Health Organization grades III/IV) are histologically characterized by cellular and nuclear atypia, neoangiogenesis, and necrosis. The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, a molecular mediator, plays a key role in vascular proliferation and tumor survival. Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor has demonstrated promising results, with improved quality of life and progression-free survival. Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a single agent in recurrent glioblastoma and is associated with manageable toxicity. This review discusses the efficacy, practical aspects, and response assessment challenges with the use of bevacizumab in the treatment of high-grade gliomas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 96 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,418,069
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#500
of 3,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,897
of 213,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#15
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,014 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.