↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Contralateral comparison of blue-filtering and non-blue-filtering intraocular lenses: glare disability, heterochromatic contrast, and photostress recovery

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Contralateral comparison of blue-filtering and non-blue-filtering intraocular lenses: glare disability, heterochromatic contrast, and photostress recovery
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2010
DOI 10.2147/opth.s15102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Billy R Hammond, Lisa M Renzi, Sohel Sachak, Stephen F Brint

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Other 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 45%
Computer Science 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#853
of 3,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,496
of 197,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.