↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cancer survivors’ perspectives and experience on western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine treatment and rehabilitation: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Cancer survivors’ perspectives and experience on western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine treatment and rehabilitation: a qualitative study
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, December 2014
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s76617
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji-Wei Wang, Zhi-Qi Yang, Cong Liu, Si-Jia Chen, Qian Shen, Tian-Rui Zhang, Nancy S Partike, Zheng-Ping Yuan, Jin-Ming Yu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,858,208
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#307
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,297
of 369,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.