| Title |
Comparisons of Four Acne Grading Systems Recommended in China, Korea, and Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s400226 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruixing Yu, Miao Chen, Huijuan Zhao, Jungang Yang, Tong Li, Yong Cui |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 23% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 23% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#17,451,209
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#567
of 916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,936
of 478,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#24
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.