| Title |
Nominal group technique to select attributes for discrete choice experiments: an example for drug treatment choice in osteoporosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s38408 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mickael Hiligsmann, Caroline van Durme, Piet Geusens, Benedict GC Dellaert, Carmen D Dirksen, Trudy van der Weijden, Jean-Yves Reginster, Annelies Boonen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,567,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,318
of 1,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,483
of 297,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.