↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Peripapillary and Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness in Retinal Vein Occlusions [Response to Letter]

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
Title
Peripapillary and Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness in Retinal Vein Occlusions [Response to Letter]
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2023
DOI 10.2147/opth.s409948
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Filipa Moleiro, Gonçalo Godinho, Carolina Madeira, Ana Faria Pereira, Elisete Brandão, Fernando Falcão-Reis, João Nuno Beato, Susana Penas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#20,673,680
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2,606
of 3,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,816
of 422,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#29
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,715 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.