| Title |
A Review of Major Danish Biobanks: Advantages and Possibilities of Health Research in Denmark
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s392416 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristina Laugesen, Jonas Mengel-From, Kaare Christensen, Jørn Olsen, David M Hougaard, Lasse Boding, Anja Olsen, Christian Erikstrup, Merete Lund Hetland, Estrid Høgdall, Alisa D Kjaergaard, Erik Sørensen, Anja Brügmann, Eva Rabing Brix Petersen, Ivan Brandslund, Børge G Nordestgaard, Gorm B Jensen, Nils Skajaa, Frederikke Schønfeldt Troelsen, Cecilia Hvitfeldt Fuglsang, Lise Skovgaard Svingel, Henrik T Sørensen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#19,930,914
of 24,494,826 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#617
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,384
of 448,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,494,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.