| Title |
Lymphatic Flow: A Potential Target in Sepsis-Associated Acute Lung Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inflammation Research, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jir.s284090 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chenghua Wu, Hui Li, Puhong Zhang, Chao Tian, Jun Luo, Wenyan Zhang, Suwas Bhandari, Shengwei Jin, Yu Hao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 19% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 31% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,103,547
of 23,524,722 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inflammation Research
#136
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,479
of 422,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inflammation Research
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,524,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.