Title |
Consensus on the Use of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers from the Cohesive Polydensified Matrix Range: Best Practice in Specific Facial Indications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s311017 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jani van Loghem, Sonja Sattler, Gabriela Casabona, Sebastian Cotofana, Sabrina Guillen Fabi, Kate Goldie, Uliana Gout, Martina Kerscher, Ting Song Lim, Carla de Sanctis Pecora, Gerhard Sattler, Ada Trindade de Almeida, Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha, Philip Werschler, Tatjana Pavicic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 18 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,669,432
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#718
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328,494
of 433,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.