↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Strategies for reducing medication errors in the emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in Open access emergency medicine OAEM, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 231)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
38 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
Strategies for reducing medication errors in the emergency department
Published in
Open access emergency medicine OAEM, July 2014
DOI 10.2147/oaem.s64174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyle A Weant, Abby M Bailey, Stephanie N Baker

Abstract

Medication errors are an all-too-common occurrence in emergency departments across the nation. This is largely secondary to a multitude of factors that create an almost ideal environment for medication errors to thrive. To limit and mitigate these errors, it is necessary to have a thorough knowledge of the medication-use process in the emergency department and develop strategies targeted at each individual step. Some of these strategies include medication-error analysis, computerized provider-order entry systems, automated dispensing cabinets, bar-coding systems, medication reconciliation, standardizing medication-use processes, education, and emergency-medicine clinical pharmacists. Special consideration also needs to be given to the development of strategies for the pediatric population, as they can be at an elevated risk of harm. Regardless of the strategies implemented, the prevention of medication errors begins and ends with the development of a culture that promotes the reporting of medication errors, and a systematic, nonpunitive approach to their elimination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 210 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 21%
Student > Bachelor 35 17%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 5%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 57 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 11%
Unspecified 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 61 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,029,164
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#3
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,812
of 242,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them