| Title |
Achalasia following reflux disease: coincidence, consequence, or accommodation? An experience-based literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s152429 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andras Vereczkei, Laura Bognar, Andras Papp, Örs Peter Horvath |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 43% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 86% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,338,962
of 23,504,445 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#202
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,321
of 440,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.