↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Predictors of disability-related attitudes: considering self-esteem, communication apprehension, contact, and geographic location

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of disability-related attitudes: considering self-esteem, communication apprehension, contact, and geographic location
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, December 2016
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s113218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Magsamen-Conrad, Dinah Tetteh, Yen-I Lee

Abstract

Individuals' attitudes about persons with disability (PwD) strongly affect differently-abled persons' quality of life and position in society. Some research offers support for the ability of systematic, supported, longitudinal contact between different groups of individuals to improve attitudes. College campuses, in particular, offer a potentially useful arena in which to facilitate this type of contact. This study explored contextual factors (eg, geographic region, biological sex) and predictors of disability-related attitudes among a college student population to determine strategies for course-based intervention design (eg, as community-engaged or service-learning initiatives). Surveying participants from universities in two regions of the United States, we found that self-esteem, audience-based communication apprehension, and contact with PwD explain more than 50% of the variance in disability-related attitudes. Further, we found that geographic location affects both self-esteem and audience-based communication apprehension (communicating/interacting with PwD). We discuss the implications for community engagement and/or service learning and highlight the importance of partnerships among relevant community stakeholders, including university faculty, students, and staff.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 20%
Psychology 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2016.
All research outputs
#16,188,873
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#347
of 778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,538
of 417,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.