| Title |
Optimal management of carpal tunnel syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s7682 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shimpei Ono, Philip J Clapham, Kevin C Chung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 47 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,847,372
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#87
of 1,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,466
of 95,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.