Title |
Identification and Experimental Validation of the Prognostic Significance and Immunological Correlation of Glycosylation-Related Signature and ST6GALNAC4 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.2147/jhc.s400472 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tianxing Dai, Jing Li, Run-Bin Liang, Haoyuan Yu, Xu Lu, Guoying Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,857,708
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
#78
of 227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,042
of 279,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 227 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.