The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
The Effects of Switching from Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Bone Mineral Density in Diabetic Patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.2147/dmso.s389964 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chun-Feng Huang, Tso-Yen Mao, Shinn-Jang Hwang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 33% |
Student > Master | 3 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 60% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,039,521
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
#218
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,521
of 487,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.