| Title |
Improving the economic and humanistic outcomes for diabetic patients: making a case for employer-sponsored medication therapy management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ceor.s40735 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharrel L Pinto, Jinender Kumar, Gautam Partha, Robert A Bechtol |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to determine the cost savings of a pharmacist-led, employer-sponsored medication therapy management (MTM) program for diabetic patients and to assess for any changes in patient satisfaction and self-reported medication adherence for enrollees. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 54 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,783,328
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#133
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,456
of 213,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.