↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Exacerbations and health care resource utilization in patients with airflow limitation diseases attending a primary care setting: the PUMA study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Exacerbations and health care resource utilization in patients with airflow limitation diseases attending a primary care setting: the PUMA study
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, December 2016
DOI 10.2147/copd.s120776
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Montes de Oca, Carlos Aguirre, Maria Victorina Lopez Varela, Maria E Laucho-Contreras, Alejandro Casas, Filip Surmont

Abstract

COPD, asthma, and asthma-COPD overlap increase health care resource consumption, predominantly because of hospitalization for exacerbations and also increased visits to general practitioners (GPs) or specialists. Little information is available regarding this in the primary care setting. To describe the prevalence and number of GP and specialist visits for any cause or due to exacerbations in patients with COPD, asthma, and asthma-COPD overlap. COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio <0.70; asthma was defined as prior medical diagnosis, wheezing in the last 12 months, or wheezing plus reversibility (post-bronchodilator FEV1 or FVC increase ≥200 mL and ≥12%); asthma-COPD overlap was defined as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.70 plus prior asthma diagnosis. Health care utilization was evaluated as GP and/or specialist visits in the previous year. Among the 1,743 individuals who completed the questionnaire, 1,540 performed acceptable spirometry. COPD patients had a higher prevalence of any medical visits to any physician versus those without COPD (37.2% vs 21.8%, respectively) and exacerbations doubled the number of visits. The prevalence of any medical visits to any physician was also higher in asthma patients versus those without asthma (wheezing: 47.2% vs 22.7%; medical diagnosis: 54.6% vs 21.6%; wheezing plus reversibility: 46.2% vs 23.8%, respectively). Asthma patients with exacerbations had twice the number of visits versus those without an exacerbation. The number of visits was higher (2.8 times) in asthma-COPD overlap, asthma (1.9 times), or COPD (1.4 times) patients versus those without these respiratory diseases; the number of visits due to exacerbation was also higher (4.9 times) in asthma-COPD overlap, asthma (3.5 times), and COPD (3.8 times) patients. COPD, asthma, and asthma-COPD overlap increase the prevalence of medical visits and, therefore, health care resource utilization. Attempts to reduce health care resource use in these patients require interventions aimed at preventing exacerbations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Other 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2017.
All research outputs
#5,267,895
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#626
of 2,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,967
of 417,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#30
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.