↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nedaplatin: a cisplatin derivative in cancer chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Nedaplatin: a cisplatin derivative in cancer chemotherapy
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, May 2013
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s35785
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muneaki Shimada, Hiroaki Itamochi, Junzo Kigawa

Abstract

Nedaplatin, a cisplatin analog, has been developed to decrease the toxicities induced by cisplatin, such as nephrotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity. The dose of nedaplatin is determined by body surface area, not by the area under the curve (AUC). The recommended therapeutic dose is 80-100 mg/m(2), although the pharmacokinetic profile of nedaplatin is similar to that of carboplatin. In our preliminary study, there was a favorable correlation between AUC and creatinine clearance (CL), suggesting that renal function should be considered when nedaplatin is administered. Ishibashi's formula, ie, DoseNDP = AUC × CLNDP, where CLNDP = 0.0738 × creatinine clearance + 4.47, would be predictable and useful for estimating the individual dose of nedaplatin. Several Phase II studies have suggested that nedaplatin might be a useful second analog, especially for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, esophageal cancer, uterine cervical cancer, head and neck cancer, or urothelial cancer. Further, nedaplatin was reported to be a useful chemotherapeutic agent with radiosensitizing properties; however, there is no Phase III study of nedaplatin, neither with chemotherapy nor with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, because nedaplatin is not commonly used throughout the world. Further evaluation in a randomized controlled trial is warranted to demonstrate definitively the activity of nedaplatin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 141 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 20%
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 43 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 42 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 42 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#323
of 2,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,748
of 204,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,075 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.