↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Long-term survival for COPD patients receiving noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Long-term survival for COPD patients receiving noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, April 2013
DOI 10.2147/copd.s42632
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrid L Titlestad, Annmarie T Lassen, Jørgen Vestbo

Abstract

Implementation of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) as an add-on treatment has been routinely used in a non-intensive care setting since 2004 for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure at a university hospital in Denmark. Although randomized controlled trials show lowered mortality rates in highly selected patients with acute exacerbation and respiratory failure, there are only few reports on long-term survival after receiving NIV. We present long-term all-cause mortality data from patients receiving NIV for the first time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Computer Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,613
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,776
of 212,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.