↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Circulating nucleic acids as biomarkers for allograft injury after solid organ transplantation: current state-of-the-art

Overview of attention for article published in Transplant Research and Risk Management, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Circulating nucleic acids as biomarkers for allograft injury after solid organ transplantation: current state-of-the-art
Published in
Transplant Research and Risk Management, June 2019
DOI 10.2147/trrm.s204233
Authors

Sabrina K Pattar, Steven C Greenway

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 28%
Other 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,754,533
of 23,572,509 outputs
Outputs from Transplant Research and Risk Management
#10
of 25 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,426
of 351,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transplant Research and Risk Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them