↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effects of parecoxib on postoperative pain and opioid-related symptoms following gynecologic surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Effects of parecoxib on postoperative pain and opioid-related symptoms following gynecologic surgery
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, November 2016
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s111733
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce Parsons, Qijiang Zhu, Li Xie, Chunming Li, Raymond Cheung

Abstract

To examine the analgesic and opioid-sparing effects of parecoxib following major gynecologic surgery. This is a large subset analysis of patients from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of parecoxib/valdecoxib (PAR/VAL) for postoperative pain. Pain severity, pain interference with function, opioid use, occurrence of opioid-related symptoms, and Patient/Physician Global Evaluation of Study Medication were compared between placebo and PAR/VAL treatment groups in the days following surgery. Pain scores were reduced in the PAR/VAL group (n=98), relative to placebo (n=97), on Day 2 (-21%, P<0.001) and Day 3 (-23%, P=0.004). Pain interference with function scores were also significantly lower in the PAR/VAL group, compared with placebo, on Day 2 (-29%, P<0.001) and Day 3 (-28%, P=0.013). Consumption of supplemental morphine was significantly lower in the PAR/VAL group relative to placebo at 24 hours (-37%, P=0.010) and trended lower at 48 (-28%) and 72 hours (-26%). Patients in the PAR/VAL group also had a reduced risk of experiencing specific opioid-related symptoms, including "inability to concentrate" (relative risk =0.53) and "nausea" (relative risk =0.60) on Day 2. Both Patient and Physician Global Evaluation of Study Medication scores were better in the PAR/VAL group than in the placebo group. The current study adds support for the use of parecoxib in patients following major gynecologic surgery.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 6 32%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 63%
Psychology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#507
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,460
of 317,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#13
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.