↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Do medical students’ scores using different assessment instruments predict their scores in clinical reasoning using a computer-based simulation?

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Medical Education and Practice, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Do medical students’ scores using different assessment instruments predict their scores in clinical reasoning using a computer-based simulation?
Published in
Advances in Medical Education and Practice, February 2015
DOI 10.2147/amep.s77459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariam Fida, Salah Eldin Kassab

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Lecturer 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 40%
Computer Science 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2023.
All research outputs
#23,100,963
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Medical Education and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,478
of 363,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Medical Education and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them