↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Demonstration of an online tool to assist managed care formulary evidence-based decision making: meta-analysis of topical prostaglandin analog efficacy

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Demonstration of an online tool to assist managed care formulary evidence-based decision making: meta-analysis of topical prostaglandin analog efficacy
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, July 2011
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s20495
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven M Kymes, Caroline Burk, Todd Feinman, Julia M Williams, David A Hollander

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to demonstrate the use of an online service for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of topical prostaglandin analogs in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Saudi Arabia 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 42%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2011.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1,204
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,912
of 127,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.