↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Flexible ureteroscopy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary treatment for renal stones 2 cm or greater

Overview of attention for article published in Reports in Medical Imaging, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Flexible ureteroscopy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary treatment for renal stones 2 cm or greater
Published in
Reports in Medical Imaging, January 2013
DOI 10.2147/rmi.s28852
Authors

Bodo Knudsen, Akar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 30%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,039,503
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Reports in Medical Imaging
#8
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,305
of 289,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reports in Medical Imaging
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them