↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Determinants of pelvic organ prolapse among gynecologic patients in Bahir Dar, North West Ethiopia: a case–control study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Determinants of pelvic organ prolapse among gynecologic patients in Bahir Dar, North West Ethiopia: a case–control study
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, December 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s122459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayalnesh Asresie, Eleni Admassu, Tesfaye Setegn

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a significant public health problem in developing countries including Ethiopia. However, less has been documented on risk factors of POP. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the determinants factors of POP. An unmatched case-control study was conducted among gynecologic patients in Bahir Dar city, North West Ethiopia, from July to October 2014. A total of 370 women (selected from outpatient departments) were included in the study. Cases (clients with stage III or IV POP) and controls (who declared free of any stages of POP) were identified by physicians using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative Examination tool. Data analysis was carried out by SPSS version 20.0. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Statistical differences were considered at P<0.05, and the strength of association was assessed by odds ratio (OR) and respective confidence intervals (CIs). This study revealed that determinants such as age of women (>40 years) (adjusted OR [AOR] =3.0 [95% CI: 1.59-5.89]), sphincter damage (AOR =8.1 [95% CI: 1.67-39.7]), family history of POP (AOR =4.9 [95% CI: 1.94-12.63]), parity (≥4) (AOR =4.5 [95% CI: 2.26-9.10]), nonattendance of formal education (AOR =4.3 [95% CI: 1.25-14.8]), carrying heavy objects (AOR =3.1 [95% CI: 1.56-6.30]), body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m(2) (AOR =3.1 [95% CI: 1.22-7.82]), and delivery assisted by nonhealth professionals (AOR =2.6 [95% CI: 1.24-5.56]) were significantly associated with POP. In our study, sphincter damage, family history of POP, being uneducated, having ≥4 vaginal deliveries, carrying heavy objects, BMI <18.5 kg/m(2), age ≥40 years, and having delivery assisted by nonhealth professional were the independent determinants of POP. Therefore, skilled delivery, further promoting family planning and girls' education, early pelvic floor assessment, and counseling on avoidance of carrying heavy objects are recommended.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Lecturer 5 6%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 34 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 35 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#16,277,409
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#493
of 895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,605
of 418,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.