| Title |
Managing Diabetic Macular Edema in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Strategies and Treatment Options
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s236423 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniele Veritti, Valentina Sarao, Valentina Soppelsa, Paolo Lanzetta |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#822
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,508
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#23
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.