↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Management of preterm labor: atosiban or nifedipine?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Management of preterm labor: atosiban or nifedipine?
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, May 2010
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s7219
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roel de Heus, Eduard J H Mulder, Gerard H A Visser

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 56%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,753,163
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#461
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,002
of 95,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.