↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Methemoglobinemia due to topical pharyngeal anesthesia during endoscopic procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Local and Regional Anesthesia , December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Methemoglobinemia due to topical pharyngeal anesthesia during endoscopic procedures
Published in
Local and Regional Anesthesia , December 2010
DOI 10.2147/lra.s12227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Srikanth Vallurupalli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 33%
Other 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 1 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 53%
Chemistry 3 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2010.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Local and Regional Anesthesia
#60
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,425
of 190,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Local and Regional Anesthesia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.