↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Evaluation of the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, December 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s111829
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fa-Jun Ju

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. A total of 71 patients with cervical cancer were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent conventional magnetic resonance imaging and DWI scanning before CRT and at 7, 14, 21 days, and 6 months after CRT. These patients were divided into the complete response (CR) and non-CR groups according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of ADC values in predicting the efficacy of CRT in cervical cancer. Compared with before-CRT treatment, tumor volumes were reduced and ADC values were elevated in both CR and non-CR groups after CRT treatment. At 21 days after CRT, tumor volumes in the CR group were smaller than those in the non-CR group. During the period of 21 days to 6 months after CRT, tumor regression rate and the increased rate of ADC values in the CR group were higher than those in the non-CR group. ROC curves revealed that the increased rate of ADC values at 21 days after CRT was the optimal time point for the prediction of CRT efficacy in cervical cancer, with the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.775, 92.7%, and 62.5%, respectively. Our study provides evidence that the increased rate of ADC at 21 days after CRT might be a promising tool for predicting the efficacy of CRT in cervical cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,146
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,648
of 416,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#32
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.